GoldiCheck
← Search results

First Flight By La Petite

Serious citation

GoldiCheck · State record

Repeat — cited again within 12 months: CCR 101416.5(b) +8 more (Staff-Infant Ratio — At approximately 1:55 p.m. LPAs observed 8 infants with 1 staff person left to supervise 5 napping children and 3 awake children. Facility is operating out of ratio.) from 2024-04-10

Already enrolled here?Talk to the director →20 findings to discuss
Last:

Changes which findings count toward the tier.

Violations by severity

Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.

  • Type A9
  • Type B11

All visits

Total 17 visits
  • 1 Annual inspection
  • 8 Complaint investigations
  • 8 Other visits
10 with citationsmost recent Aug 28, 2026

All violations

20 violations shown

CCLD Facility Search ↗Search Facility #197495125
Type A(9)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101416.5(b)Complaint investigation

Staff-Infant Ratio — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having 1 teacher with more than 4 infants on 4/27/26, 4/28/26, and 5/1/26, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

May 19, 2026
CCR 101416.5(b)Other visit

Staff-Infant Ratio — Based on LPA observation and interviews conducted, the facility is operating out of ratio repeatedly during drop off and nap time. The facility did not comply with the section cited above which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Dec 17, 2025
CCR 101416.5(b)Complaint investigation

Staff-Infant Ratio — LPAs observed two occassions where one staff member was left to supervised more than 4 infants in care which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the children in care.

Dec 19, 2024
HSC 1596.956(a)(6)Complaint investigation

1596.956 Child day care centers serving infants; optional toddler program...(a) The department shall develop guidelines and procedures...(6) The toddler program shall be conducted in areas separate from those used by older or younger children... — Based on staff interviews that were conducted LPAs confirmed children enrolled in the toddler program are commingling with the infant classroom, the facility did not comply with the section cited above in which posed a potential health,and safety risk to persons in care.

Apr 30, 2024
CCR 101429(a)(2)Complaint investigation

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on LPAs observation of staff seated on the floor with 3 children, 1 staff with one child on the diaper changing station and 2 sleeping infants in the nap room and the lack of documentation required for the sleep log, facility is not providing adequate visual and auditory supervision.

Apr 10, 2024
CCR 101416.5(b)Complaint investigation

Staff-Infant Ratio — At approximately 1:55 p.m. LPAs observed 8 infants with 1 staff person left to supervise 5 napping children and 3 awake children. Facility is operating out of ratio.

Apr 10, 2024
CCR 101416.5(b)Complaint investigation

Staff-Infant Ratio — LPA Clayton observed the Teacher - infant ratio to be out of regulatory compliance (1 Teacher caring for 5 infants), and LPA Wheatley observed the Teacher – infant ratio to be out of regulatory compliance (2 teachers caring for 16 toddlers) posing an immediate Health and Safety risk to children in care.

Nov 6, 2023
CCR 101161(a)Complaint investigation

Limitations on Capacity and Ambulatory Status — LPA Clayton observed 12 chidren (aged 2 years) and five 4 year old children in the same classroom, being supervised and instructed by the same staff, which poses and immediate Health and Safety risk to children in care.

Nov 6, 2023
CCR 101229(a)(1)Complaint investigation

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision — LPA Clayton and LPA Wheatley observed chidren on the play yard out of the visual supervision of the teacher and having to remind her tc bring the chidren to where she could see them, posing an immediate Health and Safety risk to children in care.

Nov 6, 2023
Type B(11)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101229(a)(1)Other visit

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision — Based on observations of the toddler classrooms, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 of 3 instances which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Aug 28, 2026
CCR 101212(d)(1)(C)Other visit

Reporting Requirements — Based on records reviewed, an unusual incident was not reported;the facility did not comply with the section cited above in 1 of 1 incident that occurred on 6/30/26, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Aug 21, 2026
CCR 101238(a)(2)Complaint investigation

Buildings and Grounds — Based on interviews, a child's clothing got discolored after being exposed to remnants of bleach water solution, the facility did not comply with the section cited above in 1 of 12 toddler children, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Aug 21, 2026
CCR 101212(f)Complaint investigation

Reporting Requirements — Based on interviews, an incident was not reported to the child's authorized representative until they asked about it at pickup. The facility did not comply with the section cited above in 1 of 12 toddler children, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Aug 21, 2026
CCR 101429(a)(2)(B)Complaint investigation

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 5 of 19 infant sleep checks, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

May 19, 2026
CCR 101212(d)(1)(C)Other visit

Reporting Requirements — Based on interviews, the facility did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Dec 17, 2025
CCR 101430(a)(3)(C)Other visit

Infant Care Activities — Based on LPA observation of 2 infants using sleep sacks, and interviews revealed 6 of 8 infants in the Infant 1 room use sleep sacks, the facility did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Dec 17, 2025
CCR 101429(a)(2)(C)Other visit

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on record review and interviews, documentation of 15 minute sleep checks were not maintained and available for review; the facility did not comply with the section cited above with 5 of 8 infants which pose a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Dec 17, 2025
CCR 101238(g)(1)Complaint investigation

Buildings and Grounds — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above LPAs observed cleaning solutions in an unlocked cabinet underneath the children's sink. Children were not present during the observation in which posed a potential health,and safety risk to persons in care.

Apr 30, 2024
CCR 101221(a)Other visit

Child's Records — LPA Wheatley requested Child #1 file and was unable to review because the child does not have a complete file. This is a potential risk to the heatlh & safety of children in care.

Nov 6, 2023
CCR 101216.1(c)Other visit

Teacher Qualifications and Duties — LPA Wheatley reviewed staff records and observed several staff supervising without units. This is a potential risk to the heatlh & safety of children in care.

Nov 6, 2023
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records›

California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.

🟢 No recent citation

Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.

🟡 Citation — any of:

  • A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🔴 Serious citation — any of:

  • A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

⚫ Adverse license status — any of:

  • The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license

⚪ Not rated by the record

  • Inactive license: The license is not in active standing.
  • No visits on record: Actively licensed, but CCLD has published no visit report for this facility.

Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A marks a facility Serious citation, matching CCLD's own grading directly.

Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #197495125).

First Flight By La Petite — inspection record · Los Angeles, CA