Barton, Andrea Family Child Care
Family Day Care Home · Licensed · Licensed since Jan 29, 2016
GoldiCheck · State record
Type A finding — CCLD's most serious violation grade: CCR 102417(a) +1 more (Family home — children supervised at all times — Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The LPA arrived at the facility at 9:00 a.m. and rang the doorbell. Through the door’s panel window, the LPA observed a teenage child lying on the couch and an infant asleep in a swing. The LPA waved at the teenage child, who immediately stood up. The LPA remained at the door but no longer observed the teenage child. A few minutes later, the teenage child returned and used his foot to pull the swing, moving the infant out of the LPA’s view. The LPA rang the doorbell and knocked on the door three additional times. The LPA also attempted to contact the licensee by calling three times, leaving two voicemails, and sending a text message. Nineteen minutes later, the licensee responded via text, stating that her phone had been dead and that she was outside in the backyard with one infant and three children while they were playing. Per the licensee’s own admission, the licensee stated that she was not in the home with the other four children in care and had left Infant #1 in the care of her 15-year-old son which posed an immediate health, safety or personal risk to persons in care.) from 2025-12-15
Changes which findings count toward the tier.
Violations by severity
Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.
- Type A2
- Type B2
All violations
4 violations shown
Type A(2)
Family home — children supervised at all times — Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The LPA arrived at the facility at 9:00 a.m. and rang the doorbell. Through the door’s panel window, the LPA observed a teenage child lying on the couch and an infant asleep in a swing. The LPA waved at the teenage child, who immediately stood up. The LPA remained at the door but no longer observed the teenage child. A few minutes later, the teenage child returned and used his foot to pull the swing, moving the infant out of the LPA’s view. The LPA rang the doorbell and knocked on the door three additional times. The LPA also attempted to contact the licensee by calling three times, leaving two voicemails, and sending a text message. Nineteen minutes later, the licensee responded via text, stating that her phone had been dead and that she was outside in the backyard with one infant and three children while they were playing. Per the licensee’s own admission, the licensee stated that she was not in the home with the other four children in care and had left Infant #1 in the care of her 15-year-old son which posed an immediate health, safety or personal risk to persons in care.
Personal Rights — Based on LPA observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Upon arrival, the LPA observed Infant #1 asleep in a compact swing and being supervised by a teenage child and also observed the teenage child moving the infant in the compact swing using his foot that placed the infant at risk of injury, which posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type B(2)
Family home — telephone service — Based on observation and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The LPA attempted to contact the licensee by calling three times, leaving two voicemails, and sending a text message. The licensee stated that her phone was dead which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Safe Sleep — Based on LPA observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed infant #1 asleep on the compact swing which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records›
California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.
🔴 Serious concerns — any of:
- The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
- A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟡 Watch carefully — any of:
- A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟢 Clean
Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.
Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.
Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #153909560).
This is a home-based program. The operator's name and address are published by CCLD as part of the licensing record, under state transparency law; we republish only what that record makes public.