Children Of Our Savior
Infant Center · Licensed · Licensed since Jun 20, 2023
GoldiCheck · State record
Type A finding — CCLD's most serious violation grade: CCR 101416.5(b) +4 more (Staff-Infant Ratio — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, between 1:43pm to 2:00pm LPA observed only one staff providing care and supervision for 5 infants; two of which were awake and the other three napping, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.) from 2024-08-13
Changes which findings count toward the tier.
Violations by severity
Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.
- Type A5
- Type B7
All violations
12 violations shown
Type A(5)
Criminal Record Clearance — Based on observation, record review and information obtained the facility did not comply with the section cited above, 4 children were left under the supervision of an uncleared staff (S3) during today’s visit from 9:00am to 10:54am., which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Staff-Infant Ratio — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, between 1:43pm to 2:00pm LPA observed only one staff providing care and supervision for 5 infants; two of which were awake and the other three napping, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Center Sleeping Equipment — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, at 1:10pm LPA Castellanos observed a loose blanket and a plushy blanket inside the crib with the sleeping infant (C2), which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Activities — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, at 1:09 p.m. in the napping area LPA observed two infants (C4 & C1) out of 4 infants sleeping with oversized sleeping sacks, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Activities — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, at 1:10pm LPA observed infant (C1) not sleeping on her back, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type B(7)
Personal Rights — LPA observed infants being waken up from napping at 10:08am and 10:19am by staff. Infants were unable to sleep without interference from staff.
Infant Care Activities — LPA reviewed infant sleep charts of the infants under 12 months of age. LPA observed 6 infant sleep charts of children under the age of 12 months. LPA observed on 6 of 6 infant sleep charts, that infants under the age of 12 months are placed in a position other than their back to sleep.
Infant Care Activities — LPA observed No signature for provider in Section D of LIC 9227on 5 of 7 forms. LPA observed 2 of 7 infant files to be missing LIC 9227 forms. No LIC 9227 forms for two children under 12 months of age . LPA observed infant two (2) children sleeping on their stomach during resting time.
Personal Rights — Based on LPA observation on 09/09/2024 and interviews conduct of all relevant parties it was found that staff have yelled at infants while in care, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Personnel Records — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, 1 out of 2 personnel files records were not available for review, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Food Service — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, at 1:15 p.m. LPA observed all the infant’s bottles and containers on the classroom’s counter not to be labeled with the infants’ name, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Food Service — Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, at 3:49 pm LPA observed infant (C3) drinking out of another infant’s bottle (C2), which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records›
California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.
🔴 Serious concerns — any of:
- The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
- A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟡 Watch carefully — any of:
- A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟢 Clean
Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.
Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.
Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #197495256).