GoldiCheck
← Search results

Kindercare Learning Center

Serious concerns

GoldiCheck · State record

Type A finding — CCLD's most serious violation grade: CCR 101416.5(a)(b) +3 more (Staff-Infant Ratio — Based on pertinent interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, it was revealed that the facility operated out of ratio in the infant classroom for a limited amount of time. It was revealed that this incident occured during drop-off time in the morning.) from 2025-11-26

Already enrolled here?Talk to the director →8 findings to raise
Last:

Changes which findings count toward the tier.

Violations by severity

Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.

  • Type A4
  • Type B4

All violations

8 violations shown (7 outside lookback window)

CCLD Facility SearchSearch Facility #364809088
Type A(4)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101229(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Based on the information obtained during today's visit, it was determined that Title 22 Regulation section 101229(A)(1) (Responsibility for providing Care and Supervision) was violated. The Regulation states that no child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a..... teacher at any time...Supervision shall include visual observation. It was determined that the subject child was inside the classroom by themselves for a brief period of time, defined as a matter of seconds. The way the child got back into the classroom is only based off of assumptions. — requirement not met

2026-01-30
CCR 101416.5(a)(b)Complaint Investigation Report

Staff-Infant Ratio — Based on pertinent interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, it was revealed that the facility operated out of ratio in the infant classroom for a limited amount of time. It was revealed that this incident occured during drop-off time in the morning.

2025-11-26
CCR 101416.5(d)Facility Evaluation Report

101416.5 Staff-Infant Ratio (d) There shall be one teacher to every 12 sleeping infants provided the remaining staff necessary to meet the ratios specified in (b) above are immediately available at the center. This requirment is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation there were 7 sleeping infants and 5 awake infants with only 1 staff providing care. Of the 5 awake infants, 2 were seen off their cots directly next to the staff, while 3 were sitting up on their cots. This poses/posed an immediate helath, safety, and/or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2025-04-24
CCR 101229(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision — Based on interviews obtained, it was determined that the child was able to walk out of the Infant-Toddler's main gate, as it was left open by the gardener.

2024-08-16
Type B(4)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101429(a)(1)Complaint Investigation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — During pertinent interviews, it was found that no staff was able to explain the cause of the bruising, which proves the reported allegation to be true.

2025-11-26
CCR 101223(a)(2)Complaint Investigation Report

Personal Rights — Based on the staff member's own admission and information disclosed by the witness it was stated that the staff member pushed a child, but not with malicious intent. It was stated that the intention was to redirect the child from climbing on another child.

2025-08-28
CCR 101429(1)Complaint Investigation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Pertinent interviews stated that teachers do observe these moments, but are not taking enough measures to prevent this behavior from continuing. Also, during today's visit, several children were observed to be climbing into subject the classroom's sink.

2025-08-28
CCR 101238(a)Complaint Investigation Report

Buildings and Grounds — Based on observation and interview, the facility had debris on the floor of the infant classroom including food, dust, discolored marks on the floor, and dark or discolored marks on a significant portion of the walls in the infant’s reach. Infants were observed crawling on the floor and putting their hands and feet in their mouth. Based on this information this poses/posed an immediate health, safety, and/or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2025-04-24
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records

California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.

🔴 Serious concerns — any of:

  • The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
  • A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🟡 Watch carefully — any of:

  • A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🟢 Clean

Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.

Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.

Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #364809088).

Kindercare Learning Center — inspection record · Redlands, CA