Lad N Lassie Preschool & Infant
Infant Center · Licensed · Licensed since May 28, 2010
GoldiCheck · State record
Type A finding — CCLD's most serious violation grade: CCR 101223(a)(2) (Personal Rights — Based on interviews conducted the facility did not comply with the section cited above as four staff stated they have observed a staff member force feed an infant, which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.) from 2025-10-15
Changes which findings count toward the tier.
Violations by severity
Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.
- Type A1
- Type B12
All violations
13 violations shown (1 outside lookback window)
Type A(1)
Personal Rights — Based on interviews conducted the facility did not comply with the section cited above as four staff stated they have observed a staff member force feed an infant, which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type B(12)
Personal Rights — Based on interviews conducted the facility did not comply with the section cited above as 2 staff stated they have heard staff using inapprop language which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Personal Rights — Based on interviews conducted the facility did not comply with the section cited above as staff stated infants are buckled in the activity chair watching tv without food or activity on the table which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Personal Rights — Based on interviews conducted the facility did not comply with the section cited above as two staff stated they have observed a staff member speaking negatively to an infant, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Needs and Services Plan — Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as all infants over 1 year of age are missing a Needs and Services Plan, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Center Sleeping Equipment — Based on observation and interviews the facility did not comply with the section cited above in 2 of 8 infants in care as LPA observed 8 infants in care at one time during the visit and only 6 cribs, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Buildings and Grounds — Based on observation and interviews the facility did not comply with the section cited above in 1 of 3 refridgerators missing a bottom panel which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Food Service — Based on interviews the facility did not comply with the section cited above as staff stated they have observed infants that cannon hold a bottle on their own have had their bottle propped up with a blanket, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Drinking water lead testing — Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 1facilities which did not test for lead which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Indoor Activity Space for Infants — Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 1 infant rooms with no physical separation between activity and sleeping areas, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 34 out of 34 infants with no sleep log which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Care Activities — Based on interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 34 out of 34 infants with no LIC 9227 which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Staff immunization requirements — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 5 staff files reviewed which did not contain proof of immunizations which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records›
California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.
🔴 Serious concerns — any of:
- The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
- A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟡 Watch carefully — any of:
- A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟢 Clean
Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.
Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.
Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #198015866).