GoldiCheck
← Search results

Learning Jungle Adams Avenue - Infant

Serious concerns

GoldiCheck · State record

Repeat — cited again within 12 months: CCR 101429(a)(1) +4 more (Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on interviews conducted and video reviewed,) from 2024-05-10

Already enrolled here?Talk to the director →10 findings to raise
Last:

Changes which findings count toward the tier.

Violations by severity

Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.

  • Type A5
  • Type B5

All violations

10 violations shown (2 outside lookback window)

CCLD Facility SearchSearch Facility #376701506
Type A(5)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101223(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Personal Rights — , Based on information obtained in staff interviews and LPA review of video footage of the incident, facility staff did not meet this requirement when Child 1 (C1) was handled roughly by Staff 1 (S1), which posed an immediate risk to the health, safety and personal rights of children in care.

2026-07-22
CCR 101229(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision — , based on interviews and video footage review, the facility did not comply with the section cited above, when C1 and C2 were left unsupervised on the Infant Playground for 44 seconds resulting in C1 biting C2 six times, which posed an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk for children in care.

2026-05-01
CCR 101223(a)(3)Facility Evaluation Report

Personal Rights — , Based on observation, facility did not meet this requirement when Director was observed restraining a crying infant on a sleeping mat, which posed an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to children in care.

2026-01-28
CCR 101429(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on interviews conducted and video reviewed,

2024-05-10
CCR 101429(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as S1 left the classroom which resulted in the children being left unsupervised for approximately 4-5 seconds which poses an immediate Health and Safety risk for children in care.

2024-01-05
Type B(5)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101427(a)(b)(c)Facility Evaluation Report

101427 Infant Care Food Service (a) In addition to Sections101227, the following shall apply:(b) There shall be an individual feeding plan for each infant...(c)The infant shall be fed in accordance with the individual plan. This requirment was not met as evidenced by, Based on interviews, facility staff did not meet this requirement by giving an infant another infant's bottle, which posed a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to children in care.

2025-11-13
CCR 101212(b)Facility Evaluation Report

Reporting Requirements — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2025-03-14
CCR 101429(a)(2)(B)Facility Evaluation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants — Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 5 persons did not have 15 minute sleep checks documented between 8:45am and 10:05am in infant room 1 which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-04-15
CCR 101419.3(a)Facility Evaluation Report

Modifications to Infant Needs and Services Plan — Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 4 out of 5 persons did not have quarterly updated infant needs and service plans which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-04-15
CCR 101427(j)Facility Evaluation Report

Infant Care Food Service — Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 out of 5 persons as the bottle label for Child 1 and Child 5 did not have the date which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-04-15
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records

California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.

🔴 Serious concerns — any of:

  • The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
  • A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🟡 Watch carefully — any of:

  • A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🟢 Clean

Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.

Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.

Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #376701506).

Learning Jungle Adams Avenue - Infant — inspection record · San Diego, CA