GoldiCheck
← Search results

Learning Jungle Rancho San Diego - Infant

Serious concerns

GoldiCheck · State record

Type A finding — CCLD's most serious violation grade: CCR 101223(a)(3) +1 more (Personal Rights — , Based on interviews, facility did not meet this requirement when Staff 2 was observed restraining a crying infant on a sleeping mat, which posed an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to children in care.) from 2026-05-14

Already enrolled here?Talk to the director →8 findings to raise
Last:

Changes which findings count toward the tier.

Violations by severity

Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.

  • Type A2
  • Type B6

All violations

8 violations shown (2 outside lookback window)

CCLD Facility SearchSearch Facility #376701504
Type A(2)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101223(a)(3)Facility Evaluation Report

Personal Rights — , Based on interviews, facility did not meet this requirement when Staff 2 was observed restraining a crying infant on a sleeping mat, which posed an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk to children in care.

2026-05-14
CCR 101229(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision — , based on interviews and review of video footage the facility did not comply with the section cited above when C2 exited a classroom unnoticed and was without supervision for about 50 seconds, which posed an immediate Health, Safety and/or Personal Rights risk for children in care.

2026-05-14
Type B(6)
↑ Back to violations by severity
CCR 101427(a)(b)(c)Facility Evaluation Report

101427 Infant Care Food Service (a) In addition to Sections101227, the following shall apply:(b) There shall be an individual feeding plan for each infant...(c)The infant shall be fed in accordance with the individual plan. This requirment was not met as evidenced by, Based on interviews and review of video footage, facility staff did not meet this requirement when an infant was allowed to drink from another infant's sippy cup, which posed a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to children in care.

2025-12-19
CCR 101223(a)(2)Facility Evaluation Report

Personal Rights — Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited as S2 gave C1 two sips of a breastmilk bottle belonging to C2 which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-06-28
CCR 101238(g)Facility Evaluation Report

Buildings and Grounds — Based on observation and interview , the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 28 out of 28 persons as Room 1 had dishwashing liquid located on a lower level sink; Room 2 had hand lotion, sunscreen, and a mop with an attachment containing cleaning solution; Room 3 had a mop with an attachment containing cleaning solution accessible to children which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-05-20
CCR 101415.1(a)Facility Evaluation Report

Assistant Infant Care Center Director Qualifications and Duties — Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 28 out of 28 persons in that there was no director and only an assistant director on duty with 28 infants during the time of inspection which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-05-20
CCR 101223(a)(2)Facility Evaluation Report

Personal Rights — Based on interview and record review,the licensee did not comply with with the section cited as S2 violated the personal rights of one (1) out of five (5) infants by feeding C1 the breast milk bottle belonging to C2, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2024-04-12
CCR 101223(a)(1)Facility Evaluation Report

Personal Rights — Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the personal rights of daycare children were not accorded as by S1's own admission he used inappropriate language with daycare children, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

2023-10-30
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records

California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.

🔴 Serious concerns — any of:

  • The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
  • A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🟡 Watch carefully — any of:

  • A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights

🟢 Clean

Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.

Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.

Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #376701504).

Learning Jungle Rancho San Diego - Infant — inspection record · La Mesa, CA