Mendoza Family Child Care
Family Day Care Home · Licensed · Licensed since Oct 5, 2018
GoldiCheck · State record
17 Type B violations in the last 3 year(s)
Changes which findings count toward the tier.
Violations by severity
Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.
- Type A — none in lookback
- Type B17
All violations
17 violations shown
Type B(17)
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as upon LPA arrival LPA observed that the stairs were not barricaded and children under five years old were present which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed that hazards upstairs were accessible to children in care and LPA observed a school age child walking past the barricade between the Kitchen and Dining room while no barricade was in front of the stairs at the time which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed that the last drill conducted was on 07/09/2025 which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed that C5's Identification And Emergency Information form (LIC700) was incomplete which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — admission procedures and parent rights — Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed that C1 was missing proof of the completed Family Child Care - Notification Of Parents' Rights (LIC995A) which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Reporting a child's injury or suspected abuse — Based on observation and interview, the licensees did not comply with the section cited above as there is no proof the Department was notified that construction was occurring at the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Large family home licensing requirements — Based on observation, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as upon initial facility tour LPAs observed there was no currently working carbon monoxide detector which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on observation, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs observed several poisons/toxins underneath the kitchen sink in the on-limits kitchen area which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Mandated reporter training — Based on interview and record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs observed that S4, who was assisting with the day-care children during the visit, was missing proof of the Mandated Reporter Child Care Providers Training (AB1207) which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — preventive health training, including pediatric CPR and first aid — Based on interview and record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs observed that S4, who was responsible for transporting some of the day-care children during the visit, was missing proof of pediatric EMSA approved CPR/1st Aid which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Immunizations — Based on record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs observed that C4 and C5 were missing proof of updated immunizations which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs also observed that C1 was missing proof of a signed Identification And Emergency Information (LIC700) and C5 was missing proof of the Consent For Emergency Medical Treatment (LIC627) which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — admission procedures and parent rights — Based on record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs observed that C1 and C6 were missing proof of the Family Child Care - Notification Of Parents' Rights (LIC995A) which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Operation of a Family Child Care Home — Based on record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as LPAs observed that C1 was missing proof of the Affidavit Regarding Liability Insurance For Family Child Care Home (LIC282) which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Criminal background check — Based on observation, interview, and record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as S3 is present, living, and working at the home without valid fingerprint clearance as S3 is missing a valid CACI scan, S3 does maintain state and FBI clearance, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Mandated reporter training — Based on interview and record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as both Co-Licensees do not have proof of current non-expired Mandated Reporter Child Care Providers (AB1207) certificates which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — preventive health training, including pediatric CPR and first aid — Based on interview and record review, the co-licensees did not comply with the section cited above as co-licensee Manuel Mendoza was missing proof of a valid non-expired EMSA approved CPR card which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records›
California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.
🔴 Serious concerns — any of:
- The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
- A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟡 Watch carefully — any of:
- A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟢 Clean
Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.
Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.
Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #334845158).
This is a home-based program. The operator's name and address are published by CCLD as part of the licensing record, under state transparency law; we republish only what that record makes public.