Yanez,Antoinette
Family Day Care Home · Licensed · Licensed since May 1, 1997
GoldiCheck · State record
Type A finding — CCLD's most serious violation grade: CCR 102417(g) +1 more (Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as stated in LIC809 and LIC809-Cs report, LPA observed various hazardous items that were accessible to children in care, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.) from 2025-04-24
Changes which findings count toward the tier.
Violations by severity
Type A citations mean an immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights; Type B citations mean a violation that could become one if not corrected. This grading is assigned by CCLD, not GoldiCheck.
- Type A2
- Type B8
All violations
10 violations shown
Type A(2)
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as stated in LIC809 and LIC809-Cs report, LPA observed various hazardous items that were accessible to children in care, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Safe Sleep — Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that two (2) Infants were sleeping in a unlicensed room, door was closed, licensee was not conducting the 15 minute checks, licensee did not have current or past 15 minute checks, mattresses on play yards were not well fitted, and LPA observed a stuff animal inside the play yard with an infant, checks which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type B(8)
Staffing Ratio and Capacity — Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that licensee did not have an assistant present for approximately one hour while she provided care for 9 children which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Mandated reporter training — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that Licensee and Assistant did not have a current Mandated Reporter Certificate on file, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Alterations to Existing Building or Grounds — Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed that licensee was using two areas of the home that were not licensed to be accessible to children in care, being used for children, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed the following in the hallway restroom: 15 packets of Clear Defense hand sanitizing wipes, 3 oz bottle of baby sun screen, 6 bottles of hand sanitizer, 1 tube of sunblock, a tube of toothpaste, and baby powder, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Family home — home free of safety hazards — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that it was observed that licensee did not have a current fire drill on file, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Infant Safe Sleep — Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed that there were no 15 minute logs for infants in care, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Staff immunization — influenza, pertussis and measles — Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that Licensee and Assistant did not have proof on file of their MMR and TDAP immunization, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Staffing Ratio and Capacity — Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed that Licensee was caring for a total of 10 children on her own. LPA observed 4 infants and 5 preschool children, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
How we rate this daycareCalifornia CCLD records›
California pre-grades every violation itself: Type A means an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights; Type B means a violation that, if not corrected, could become that same immediate risk. We never escalate above the state's own grade.
🔴 Serious concerns — any of:
- The license is on probation — CCLD requires the facility to comply with specific terms and conditions to prevent revocation of its license
- A Type A violation is on record — CCLD's own most serious grade, meaning an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟡 Watch carefully — any of:
- A Type B violation is on record — CCLD's own lesser-risk grade, meaning a violation that, if not corrected, could become an immediate risk to a child's health, safety, or personal rights
🟢 Clean
Actively licensed, with no violations in your lookback window.
Worth knowing: California's public records don't always say whether a specific violation was later fixed, so we don't discount a Type A's severity by guessing at correction status — CCLD's own definition notes a Type A citation "will always be issued, even if the violation is corrected on the spot." A single Type A moves a facility to Serious concerns, matching CCLD's own grading directly.
Data sourced from California CCLD (CCLD Facility Search). Last updated: Sep 14, 2026. GoldiCheck is not affiliated with CCLD. Always verify with the CCLD Facility Search record (search Facility #103900420).
This is a home-based program. The operator's name and address are published by CCLD as part of the licensing record, under state transparency law; we republish only what that record makes public.